Thomas More's Utopia addresses the societal issues of his time with thought-provoking - and at times humorous - solutions. In Utopia, a material’s worth is measured by its purposefulness. For instance, Raphael argues that “anyone can see that gold and silver are less useful than iron…Nature gave gold and silver no utility” (75). Rather, it is our own perceptions of these materials that give them value. We associate these metals with wealth due to our culture, and we thereby view them as precious. While good for making jewelry, or coins due to their rarity, gold and silver do not serve any vital purpose. Therefore, these metals are merely made into chamber pots and slave chains in Utopia (which is also to conceal the fact that people outside of Utopia value gold and silver). Even clothing made from finely-spun wool is seen as unnecessary, for it does not serve its purpose in keeping you any warmer. Gemstones are toys for children, because although they may be aesthetically pleasing, they do not have any real use for the Utopians.
It is interesting that anything we currently perceive as valuable could be turned into “marks of disgrace” simply by changing what we associate it with (76). What already disgusts us – not by its own nature, but merely by what we relate it to? What I find concerning, though, is how the mindset in Utopia would affect the arts and creative expression. Even the clothes of the Utopians resemble uniforms in that they're all very similar. If personal expression does more harm than good, then it certainly would not have a place in Utopia. However, something seems to be missing from a society that focuses so deeply on utility and not so much on artistry. While I commend this overall ideal in removing any unnecessary, negative distinction between people, a level of creativity and craftsmanship may also be lost.
Reference:
More, Thomas. Utopia. Toronto: Broadview, 2010. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment